Friday, December 5, 2025

Bombay HC: Aadhaar, PAN Not Proof of Indian Citizenship

by TALKAAJ
0 comments
Bombay high court: Aadhaar, PAN Not Proof of Indian Citizenship

Bombay High Court: Aadhaar, PAN, and Voter ID Alone Don’t Prove Indian Citizenship

The Bombay High Court recently emphasized that possessing documents like an Aadhaar card, PAN card, or voter ID does not automatically confer Indian citizenship. This crucial ruling was delivered while the court denied bail to Babu Abdul Ruf Sardar, a Bangladeshi national accused of illegally residing in India for over a decade using forged identity documents. The court clarified that such documents are primarily for identification and accessing services, and do not override the fundamental requirements of citizenship as laid out in the Citizenship Act of 1955.

This decision came during the bail hearing for a man who is alleged to have stayed in India for more than ten years with fabricated documents. A bench of Justice Amit Borkar highlighted that the Citizenship Act is the main and controlling law for all nationality-related questions in India today. This is the statute that clearly defines who can be a citizen, how citizenship can be acquired, and the situations in which it can be lost. In this specific case, the court refused bail to Babu Abdul Ruf Sardar, who is alleged to be a Bangladeshi national who entered India illegally without a valid passport or travel documents. He allegedly procured several forged Indian documents, including an Aadhaar card, PAN card, voter ID, and even an Indian passport. The court’s stance is that merely holding these documents does not, by itself, make someone an Indian citizen.


 

The Citizenship Act of 1955: The Controlling Law

 

The court’s ruling further stressed the distinction between lawful citizens and illegal migrants. The bench noted that people who fall into the category of illegal migrants are barred from obtaining citizenship through most of the legal routes mentioned in the Citizenship Act. This distinction, the court said, is essential as it protects the sovereignty of the country and ensures that the rights and benefits intended for legitimate citizens are not wrongfully claimed by those who lack the legal status to live in India.

In its decision to refuse bail to Sardar, the bench pointed out that the verification of his documents was still ongoing. The investigation was also continuing, and the police’s apprehension that he might abscond if granted bail was a genuine concern. The allegations in the case are not minor; they involve not just staying in India without permission, but also creating and using fake and forged identity documents with the deliberate aim of impersonating an Indian citizen. Sardar was booked under provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Passport (Entry to India) Act, and the Foreigners Order. The court also mentioned that the genuineness of the Aadhaar card was being verified by the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) as part of the ongoing investigation.

Allegations and Arguments

Sardar’s bail plea argued that he was a bona fide citizen of India and that there was no conclusive evidence to prove he was a national of Bangladesh. He claimed that his documents were linked with his income tax records and business registration, and that he had been living in Thane district, near Mumbai, since 2013. The prosecution, however, opposed the plea, stating that the accused might abscond if released on bail. The police also mentioned that a probe was underway to determine if a larger organized network was involved in illegal immigration and identity fraud.

The court noted in its order that the allegations against Sardar were not limited to a simple technical violation of immigration rules. Instead, they indicated a deliberate concealment of identity and the creation of forged documents to obtain the benefits of Indian citizenship. The court also reflected on the historical context, noting that when the Constitution of India was being drafted, the country had just experienced a significant transformation and the partition, which led to a massive movement of people across borders. This created a need to determine who would be accepted as citizens of the new nation. The framers of the Constitution therefore laid down provisions that provided immediate clarity on citizenship at the republic’s start, while also giving the elected Parliament the authority to create future laws on the subject

FAQs

Q: Can I use my Aadhaar card to prove my Indian citizenship?

A: No, according to a recent Bombay High Court ruling, an Aadhaar card, PAN card, or voter ID alone does not serve as proof of Indian citizenship. These documents are primarily for identification and accessing services, and do not override the requirements of the Citizenship Act of 1955.

Q: What is the primary law that governs citizenship in India?

A: The Citizenship Act of 1955 is the main and controlling law that dictates who can be a citizen of India, how citizenship can be acquired, and the conditions under which it can be lost. All questions related to nationality are decided based on this statute.

Q: Why did the Bombay High Court deny bail to Babu Abdul Ruf Sardar?

A: The court denied him bail because he is accused of being a Bangladeshi national who illegally entered and resided in India using forged documents, including an Aadhaar card and an Indian passport. The court was concerned that he might abscond while the investigation into the genuineness of his documents was still ongoing.

Q: Do illegal migrants have any legal way to obtain Indian citizenship?

A: The Bombay High Court noted that illegal migrants are generally barred from obtaining citizenship through most of the legal routes mentioned in the Citizenship Act. This distinction is made to protect the country’s sovereignty and ensure that the rights and benefits of citizens are not misused.

Q: What is the significance of this ruling?

A: This ruling reinforces the legal framework for Indian citizenship, clarifying that administrative identity documents like Aadhaar, PAN, and voter ID do not serve as proof of citizenship. It emphasizes that the Citizenship Act of 1955 is the definitive law and protects the integrity of the nation’s citizenship process.

(देश और दुनिया की ताज़ा खबरें सबसे पहले पढ़ें TalkAaj (Baat Aaj Ki) पर , आप हमें FacebookTwitterInstagram और  Youtube पर फ़ॉलो करे)

You may also like

Leave a Comment